The process, written down rather than implied

Written to a real question

Every guide starts from a query as someone would actually type it, and has to answer that question in its first three sentences. If the short answer cannot be written, the guide is not commissioned.

Specific enough to follow

Pressure, rhythm, duration, position, the exact sentence to say. A guide that would leave a reader still guessing does not pass this stage, and vagueness is the most common reason something goes back.

Clinical review

Anything touching anatomy, pain, medication or risk goes to a clinician who can hold it indefinitely. The reviewer's name and the review date go on the page once that has happened. A guide without one has not been through this step yet, and does not claim to have been.

Sourced claim by claim

Each factual claim is tied to the kind of source that supports it, listed at the foot of the guide under 'How we know this'. In this build those are labelled empty slots rather than invented references.

Re-reviewed, and dated honestly

Guides carry the date they were last reviewed. Not the date they were posted, and never a rolling timestamp that moves without anyone reading the page.